Please use this portal to submit ideas for our development team to consider in its roadmap. For support or data issues, please send an email to: iedr-support@esource.com to receive more immediate assistance.
Consider adding a definition of minimum hosting capacity vs maximum hosting capacity - both values are given and there is a wide range in their values. Consider adding a filter to the hosting capacity map so that users can see only the "mature pip...
Who would benefit? DER Stakeholders What is the status quo or problem to be solved? Don't know when the DER is good for What impact would it make? Would be able to line up data with a timeline. Useful when tracking the progress of different applic...
Google maps allows you to submit incorrect addresses, phone numbers, hours, etc. on the map with their "Suggest an edit" feature. This functionality can be added to the EIAT, possibly through the tooltips, to allow users to report issues on specif...
We recognize the significant sensitivities involved here in terms of project locations, long lead times around interconnection, etc. Strongly recommend a robust discussion with the Siting Team, LSR team, and other stakeholders, but ultimately we a...
Siting Team has a few thoughts/questions/concerns about the 'Land Cover' data layer: Utilization of single base layer: While the selected base layer - maintained by the the Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium - is useful, it is in eff...
Idea is to create a new analysis GIS tool to make quick calculations of mineral soil groups 1-4 within an uploaded facility area. This would be applicable to large-scale solar development.
In the queued DERs data table, it is unclear how “Planned Install Date” is calculated/obtained
In the queued DERs data table, it is unclear how “Planned Install Date” is calculated/obtained. No explanation of this is given in documentation and does not correspond to any dates given in PSC SIR data for DER projects
In the column header, should specify units in “DER Nameplate Rating” in table of interconnected and enqueued DER projects.
In the column header, should specify units in “DER Nameplate Rating” in table of interconnected and enqueued DER projects. If new users are supposed to understand this, don't assume they know the units of the DER projects (which appears to be kW)
Who would benefit? Researchers What is the status quo or problem to be solved? The Net Metering plan chosen is not shown for planned and installed DER What impact would it make? Understand plan choice and DER adoption How should it work? Compensat...