Please use this portal to submit ideas for our development team to consider in its roadmap. For support or data issues, please send an email to: iedr-support@esource.com to receive more immediate assistance.
Who would benefit? EAIT map viewers What is the status quo or problem to be solved? Currently, users are only able to see current status of DERs - no reference how it looked previously. What impact would it make? Have a sliding timescale and/or da...
Who would benefit? all access EAIT maps What is the status quo or problem to be solved? Currently, DER bubbles are cluttered. Users cannot tell from a high-level view how many DERs are installed and having to zoom in. It's difficult to determine c...
Who would benefit? Researchers What is the status quo or problem to be solved? The Net Metering plan chosen is not shown for planned and installed DER What impact would it make? Understand plan choice and DER adoption How should it work? Compensat...
Google maps allows you to submit incorrect addresses, phone numbers, hours, etc. on the map with their "Suggest an edit" feature. This functionality can be added to the EIAT, possibly through the tooltips, to allow users to report issues on specif...
Rate Plan page: Rate Plan Description field should be next to Rate Plan name
Currently, you have to scroll a lot to the right to see the description of the rate plan as the default view. Ideally the description should be next to the rate plan name. It will make it easier for the user to understand what the rate plans are a...
Marina Derechinskaya
2 months ago
in Rate Plans
0
Prioritized
Add data layers from CAFRI's New York Forest Carbon Assessment Report
Due to the sensitivity of this data and that CAFRI hasn't published it yet, it would need to be protected through a permission feature. Able to discuss and strategize the most efficient way to achieve this.
To the extent practicable, would be great to include some degree of supplemental information as to the disadvantaged community (DAC) designation criteria, i.e. which burden indicators trigger the DAC designation. Understand that this may be above ...
We recognize the significant sensitivities involved here in terms of project locations, long lead times around interconnection, etc. Strongly recommend a robust discussion with the Siting Team, LSR team, and other stakeholders, but ultimately we a...
Siting Team has a few thoughts/questions/concerns about the 'Land Cover' data layer: Utilization of single base layer: While the selected base layer - maintained by the the Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium - is useful, it is in eff...